AI Toolkit

Claude (Opus 4.6) vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

Claude vs Gemini compared. See how Anthropic and Google's top AI models stack up on pricing, context window, reasoning, and real-world use cases.

Anthropic
Claude (Opus 4.6)

Complex research, strategy, and high-quality writing

Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Input$15
Output$75
Context Window200K

Key Strengths

  • Best-in-class reasoning and analysis
  • Excellent long-form writing quality
  • Strong safety alignment and instruction following
Google
Gemini 2.0 Pro

Large-scale document analysis and cost-sensitive workloads

Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Input$1.25
Output$5
Context Window2M

Key Strengths

  • 10x larger context window (2M vs 200K)
  • 12x cheaper input pricing
  • Native Google Search and Workspace integration
Our Verdict

Claude delivers superior reasoning quality and writing — it is the premium choice for tasks where accuracy and nuance matter most. Gemini offers dramatically better value with its 2M context window at a fraction of the cost. Choose Claude for quality-critical work; choose Gemini for processing large volumes affordably.

Quick Comparison

FeatureClaude (Opus 4.6)Gemini 2.0 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input Price / 1M tokens$15$1.25
Output Price / 1M tokens$75$5
Context Window200K2M
Best ForComplex research, strategy, and high-quality writingLarge-scale document analysis and cost-sensitive workloads

Related Comparisons

Need Help Choosing the Right AI?

We help UK businesses integrate AI tools into their workflows. From model selection to full automation builds — we can help.

Disclaimer: Prices and features current as of February 2026. Check provider websites for latest pricing. Actual costs may vary based on usage tier, commitment discounts, and regional availability.