GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 head-to-head. Compare pricing, coding performance, context windows, and which model is better for developers in 2026.
Multimodal tasks and general-purpose AI applications
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Key Strengths
- Strong multimodal support (vision, audio, code)
- Excellent at creative tasks and brainstorming
- Largest third-party integration ecosystem
Claude Sonnet is the developer's choice — it leads on coding benchmarks, costs less per input token, and has a larger context window for processing entire codebases. GPT-4o is more versatile for multimodal and creative tasks. For software engineering, Sonnet wins; for everything else, it is a close call.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | GPT-4o | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Anthropic |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $5 | $3 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $15 | $15 |
| Context Window | 128K | 200K |
| Best For | Multimodal tasks and general-purpose AI applications | Software engineering, code review, and technical work |
Related Comparisons
Compare ChatGPT and Claude side by side. Pricing, context windows, strengths, and real-world use cases. Find out which AI model is right for you in 2026.
ChatGPT vs Gemini head-to-head comparison. Compare pricing, context windows, features, and which AI is best for your needs in 2026.
Claude vs Gemini compared. See how Anthropic and Google's top AI models stack up on pricing, context window, reasoning, and real-world use cases.
ChatGPT vs Llama 3.3 compared. Commercial AI vs open-source — pricing, data privacy, self-hosting, and which approach suits your needs in 2026.
Need Help Choosing the Right AI?
We help UK businesses integrate AI tools into their workflows. From model selection to full automation builds — we can help.
Disclaimer: Prices and features current as of February 2026. Check provider websites for latest pricing. Actual costs may vary based on usage tier, commitment discounts, and regional availability.